Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hi all, > > We're running around 25 FBSD servers, mostly 6 and a few 5-STABLE. At this time I'd say it's probably more dangerous to run 5-stable than -current. ;) > For a > few months, we also run our internal storage/smb/whatnot machine on > -current. Never had ANY issues. Just works, and better than 6-*. > > Now, we are about to replace our MX's and I'm thinking of deploying > -current on them instead of upcoming 6.2. Right now running tests on the > hardware, two ProLiant DL360G3 cpu's and everything looks just fine. If you follow this list, you know that a lot of stuff is just about to hit -current that will make life "interesting" for a while. If I were in your position, I would run 6.x on one MX, and HEAD from around now on the other, and keep a scratch box around with similar (or better yet, identical) hardware so that you can test upgrades to either version. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Fri Dec 08 2006 - 23:03:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC