Re: Running -CURRENT in production (was: Am I an Idiot?)

On 2006-12-08 23:37, JoaoBR <joao_at_matik.com.br> wrote:
> On Friday 08 December 2006 22:40, C?dric Jonas wrote:
> > Reread what he writes, and use your brain. He probably means that
> > 5-CURRENT (which was CURRENT aka HEAD long time ago) runs since a huge
> > amount a time without causing problems. And now, what was the initial
> > question?
>
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polite
>
> what do you defend here?
>
> 5.0 stopped then and  to be correct it *IS* after it went to 5.1, 5.2,
> 5.3, 5.5 to releng_5 today ... so what the heck 5.0_CURRENT-as-of-2000
> has to do  with CURRENT as of dezember 2006 which by my understandings
> is an evolution of releng_6?

"Think" for a moment there, grasshopper.

Why would a system state that its kernel version is 5.0-CURRENT 6 years
after the time HEAD was the same as 5.0-CURRENT.

The obvious answer is that it has been running without problems all this
time and its kernel was *NEVER* recompiled since back then.

Now, does it all make more sense?  Can we also, please, drop this
pointless thread, because it is already far too off-topic for this
particular mailing list?

- Giorgos