In message <200612151609.53750.shoesoft_at_gmx.net>, Stefan Ehmann writes: >On Friday 15 December 2006 14:39, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Unfortunately, that is not what you have done, because you have >> not indicated what the standard deviation on your numbers are, >> so they are totally worthless. >I've done 3 runs on an otherwise pretty idle system with a maximum deviation >of maybe 1 million instructions. So I figured that accurately calculating the >standard deviation would overshoot the mark for this primitive test. If you had included this information, all would have been fine. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 16:50:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC