On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref. > > > src/sys/conf/NOTES). > > > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING. > > Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without > LIBALIAS? i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the > libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are > saying? with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds 40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size. If it's really an issue, i can change it. P.Received on Sun Dec 31 2006 - 02:13:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC