Re: Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits?

From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:04:53 +0300
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:42:03AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
P> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
P> > On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote:
P> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
P> > > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref.
P> > > > src/sys/conf/NOTES).
P> > >
P> > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING.
P> > 
P> > Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without 
P> > LIBALIAS?  i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the 
P> > libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are 
P> > saying?
P> 
P> with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds
P> 40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size.
P> 
P> If it's really an issue, i can change it. 

As I said it will be very nice if it would be still possible to build
ipfw(4) w/o libalias. I think more people will share my opinion.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Received on Sun Dec 31 2006 - 06:34:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC