On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: > > The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the - > CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason > for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make > sense. I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary. -- DEReceived on Wed Feb 01 2006 - 01:25:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC