On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: > >> > >>The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the - > >>CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason > >>for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make > >>sense. > > > >I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably > >6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the > >release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able > >to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary. > > > This is EXACTLY what I am saying. I am not a -current user, I am a - > stable user and this happened about a week ago or so. It was > libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently. The confusion seems to be that you sent your email to the wrong mailing list. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC