Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-11 02:02, Krzysztof Kowalik <kkowalik_at_uci.agh.edu.pl> wrote: >> Jonathan Noack <noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu> wrote: >>> I think debug.cpufreq.lowest is what you want. It is documented in >>> cpufreq(4): >> Oh, indeed. And to think that I actually did read this manual page. >> Thank you. :-) > > Isn't the minimum level limited by dev.cpu.0.freq_levels though? My recollection is that setting debug.cpufreq.lowest would result in low values being removed from dev.cpu.0.freq_levels. So if dev.cpu.0.freq_levels started at "800/-1 400/-1 200/-1 100/-1" and you set debug.cpufreq.lowest to "300", dev.cpu.0.freq_levels would then become "800/-1 400/-1". -JonathanReceived on Sat Feb 11 2006 - 00:34:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC