On 2006-02-10 20:34, Jonathan Noack <noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-02-11 02:02, Krzysztof Kowalik <kkowalik_at_uci.agh.edu.pl> wrote: >>>Jonathan Noack <noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu> wrote: >>>> I think debug.cpufreq.lowest is what you want. It is documented in >>>> cpufreq(4): >>> >>> Oh, indeed. And to think that I actually did read this manual page. >>> Thank you. :-) >> >> Isn't the minimum level limited by dev.cpu.0.freq_levels though? > > My recollection is that setting debug.cpufreq.lowest would result in low > values being removed from dev.cpu.0.freq_levels. So if > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels started at "800/-1 400/-1 200/-1 100/-1" and you > set debug.cpufreq.lowest to "300", dev.cpu.0.freq_levels would then > become "800/-1 400/-1". Ah! I see... Thanks for the explanation :)Received on Sat Feb 11 2006 - 00:38:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC