On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:39:08AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:21:48AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > > > > > No. The change to link in libc by default and libpthread with -pthread > > > > are inthe works and will be committed shortly. There is not way around > > > > this if we want working versioned libc and libpthread in our system. > > > > > > Why is that? We really don't want -pthread to build in libpthread > > > dependency when linking shared libraries. > > > > Uh, well, you do if you want to use GCC 4.2.X > > Why? If one _really_ needs a shared library linked to libpthread, > -lpthread will always work. > > -- > DE > Just think for a moment how exactly will your shared library depend on a specific symbol version in C or thread libraries if no dependencies on libc.so.6 and libpthread.so.2 were recorded in the first place? When no -lc or -lpthreed were seen by ld at all? The symbol is defined by a name, version and library's SONAME. -- Alexander KabaevReceived on Sat Feb 11 2006 - 14:26:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC