Scott Long writes: | Joao Barros wrote: | > On 7/11/06, John Baldwin <john_at_baldwin.cx> wrote: | > | >> I have a patch for amr(4) that is a forward-port of a Scott Long patch | >> for 4.x | >> that fixes some severe data corruption with amr(4) + PAE on 4.x with > | >> 4GB of | >> RAM. I need the patch tested on current though so I can get it into | >> HEAD and | >> eventually into 4.x. The patch for head is at | >> http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/amr_head.patch It shouldn't break | >> anything and should basically be a nop. I think the patch will apply | >> to 6.x | >> (and possibly 5.x) as well. Thanks! | >> | > | > I can test it on i386 without PAE. Is that test enough? | | Note that this problem is only present when you're using a management | app at the same time as heavy disk activity is going on. If you're | not using a management app (and few people are, the lack of apps is why | I didn't catch this in the first place), then you're completely safe. | John's email might be taken as a little alarmist in this respect. Hmm, I wonder why we don't see it or maybe we are :-( We don't usually hit the disk hard but have a management app. running. I've seen some strangeness. Doug A.Received on Thu Jul 13 2006 - 17:51:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC