Joao Barros wrote: > On 7/11/06, John Baldwin <john_at_baldwin.cx> wrote: > >> I have a patch for amr(4) that is a forward-port of a Scott Long patch >> for 4.x >> that fixes some severe data corruption with amr(4) + PAE on 4.x with > >> 4GB of >> RAM. I need the patch tested on current though so I can get it into >> HEAD and >> eventually into 4.x. The patch for head is at >> http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/amr_head.patch It shouldn't break >> anything and should basically be a nop. I think the patch will apply >> to 6.x >> (and possibly 5.x) as well. Thanks! >> > > I can test it on i386 without PAE. Is that test enough? > Note that this problem is only present when you're using a management app at the same time as heavy disk activity is going on. If you're not using a management app (and few people are, the lack of apps is why I didn't catch this in the first place), then you're completely safe. John's email might be taken as a little alarmist in this respect. ScottReceived on Thu Jul 13 2006 - 13:33:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC