On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > > Paolo should follow up in the next days with graphs and more data. > > > > Here are graphs and data: > > > > http://mercurio.sm.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/ > > > > and here is a tarball with all images, data and patches: > > > > http://mercurio.sm.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/interrupt.tgz > > ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here > i disabled SMP): > > phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks, this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ? > but interrupt masking overhead it's still there. and this needs a bit of investigation instead... cheers luigiReceived on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 13:31:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC