Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: > >>On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >>> >>>>Paolo should follow up in the next days with graphs and more data. >>> >>>Here are graphs and data: >>> >>>http://mercurio.sm.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/ >>> >>>and here is a tarball with all images, data and patches: >>> >>>http://mercurio.sm.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/interrupt.tgz >> >>ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here >>i disabled SMP): >> >>phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks, > > > this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ? > > >>but interrupt masking overhead it's still there. > > > and this needs a bit of investigation instead... > I haven't been paying close enough attention, have all of the calcru problems and other side effects been fixed from phk's work? ScottReceived on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 13:42:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC