Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:42:16AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >>Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > ... > >>>>ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here >>>>i disabled SMP): >>>> >>>>phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks, >>> >>>this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ? > > ... > >>I haven't been paying close enough attention, have all of the calcru >>problems and other side effects been fixed from phk's work? > > > we should ask phk. As far as i remember the only "problem" > is/was that the sys/user times are computed as if the > cpu were running at its max speed. But this is in fact > a good thing because it is a more consistent measurement of > the cost of the CPU work, which decouples us from having > to take care of variable cpu speed. > > luigi No, I'm talking about all of the resulting problems with processes generating calcru messages on the console. ScottReceived on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 13:50:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC