Re: interesting(?) data on network interrupt servicing

From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:35:14 -0800
Scott Long wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:42:16AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>> ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here i 
>>>>> disabled SMP):
>>>>>
>>>>> phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks,
>>>>
>>>> this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ?
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> I haven't been paying close enough attention, have all of the calcru
>>> problems and other side effects been fixed from phk's work?
>>
>>
>> we should ask phk. As far as i remember the only "problem"
>> is/was that the sys/user times are computed as if the
>> cpu were running at its max speed. But this is in fact
>> a good thing because it is a more consistent measurement of
>> the cost of the CPU work, which decouples us from having
>> to take care of variable cpu speed.
>>
>> luigi
> 
> No, I'm talking about all of the resulting problems with processes
> generating calcru messages on the console.

I still see them here with ACPI-safe TC.

-Maxim
Received on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 19:35:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC