Scott Long wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:42:16AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Luigi Rizzo wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>>> ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here i >>>>> disabled SMP): >>>>> >>>>> phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks, >>>> >>>> this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ? >> >> ... >> >>> I haven't been paying close enough attention, have all of the calcru >>> problems and other side effects been fixed from phk's work? >> >> >> we should ask phk. As far as i remember the only "problem" >> is/was that the sys/user times are computed as if the >> cpu were running at its max speed. But this is in fact >> a good thing because it is a more consistent measurement of >> the cost of the CPU work, which decouples us from having >> to take care of variable cpu speed. >> >> luigi > > No, I'm talking about all of the resulting problems with processes > generating calcru messages on the console. I still see them here with ACPI-safe TC. -MaximReceived on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 19:35:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC