On Wednesday 10 May 2006 02:23, Kris Kennaway wrote: > There are at least several issues here: > > * Factor of >two difference in performance across the board (all > loads) relative to Linux. This may be general issues like > gettimeofday() on Linux vs FreeBSD; clearly there is something *very > big* to blame here. Mysql does do *lots* of such calls, so the cost > of them is surely a component in performance, the only question is if > it's the main one. > My last recall is that gettimeofday is not a syscall on Linux, they called it vgettimeofday, they also have a lower overhead syscall: vsyscall which uses sysenter/sysexit when CPU supports, they do calculation in userland, the page is exported by kernel which can be executed by userland. at least I saw the idea on one serious hacker's blog, but now I can not find the URL. > * When you get some of the locking out of the way (per this thread) > FreeBSD has 44% better peak performance on Sven's test on amd64, but > tails off by about 33% at higher loads compared to unpatched. I see > similar changes on 12-CPU E4500, but not as much performance gain (may > be due to other reasons). i.e. optimizing the locking allows a new, > bigger bottleneck to suck on center stage. This is the basis for my > observation about libthr at high loads. It is not the same as the > above issue. > > Kris Fixing one of big lock contentions is not enough, you have to fix them all, it is easy to see that a second contention becomes a top one. :-)Received on Tue May 09 2006 - 21:26:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:55 UTC