On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:05:07 +0800 David Xu <davidxu_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Friday 19 May 2006 09:10, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > Ok. What should I do before adding the above #ifdef's? Is it enough to > > change following files only? > > > > src/sys/conf/options > I think they are sys/conf/options.i386 and sys/conf/options.amd64 Ok, then should I also change sys/conf/options.pc98 ? I don't know much about the PC98. What processors there are in use? > > src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > > src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES > > src/sys/i386/conf/PAE > > src/sys/i386/conf/SMP > > src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > > src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES > > src/sys/amd64/conf/SMP > > > I think modifying GENERIC and NOTES is enough. Then PAE and SMP kernels will be vulnerable on AMD by default? > > > but I would call it BUG_FXSAVE like Linux's select() > > > changed timeout value which only added incompatibility rather than > > > advantage. > > > > I don't know about Linux's select() but according to what I've seen on > > their "7466f9e72dac13452d871a3fb72fc7bd9c93c864" commit they use > > X86_FEATURE_FXSAVE_LEAK. What do you think about FXSAVE_LEAK instead of > > BUG_FXSAVE? > > I have no objection. Ok, I'll use FXSAVE_LEAK.Received on Fri May 19 2006 - 07:59:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC