Re: jemalloc paper/slides available

Hi,

Although I can't comment on the sudden performance dropoff, I would
like to point out that the numbers from the benchmark imply that the
benchmark isn't using non-temporal loads and stores on either
platform.

The "it should just work" comment doesn't apply as it equates to
driving a racecar with 6 gears and then never using anything higher
than 5th in competition - because "it should just work".

 -Kip

On 5/21/06, Attila Nagy <bra_at_fsn.hu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2006. 05. 18. 19:19, Jason Evans wrote:
> > The paper and slides for jemalloc that I presented at BSDcan 2006 are
> > available at:
> >     http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/bsdcan2006/
> > If you read only one or the other, choose the paper.
> Thank you. Here is a quick comparison (the article is in hungarian) on a
> Sun T2000 with Solaris and Linux and an Intel dual core low voltage Xeon
> (Sossaman, Core Duo as a server processor):
> http://hup.hu/node/25322
>
> I've lost the results for FreeBSD 6 for different blocksizes, so only
> 1kB is on the picture, which contains all OSs. With 1MB, you can see
> only Solaris and Linux on the same machine, besides FreeBSD -CURRENT.
>
> Do you have any ideas about the sudden drop after 16 threads? (the
> machine had four cores)
>
> --
> Attila Nagy                                   e-mail: Attila.Nagy_at_fsn.hu
> Free Software Network (FSN.HU)                 phone: +3630 306 6758
> http://www.fsn.hu/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>