Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:06:51 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <4475CD42.2010509_at_tenebras.com>
            Michael Sierchio <kudzu_at_tenebras.com> writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
: 
: > For smaller systems, an additive approach would make more sense
: 
: Amen.  For larger systems, too, IMHO.  I've been saying this for
: years, but even those things which we think of as necessary for
: most installs (MTA, DNS, toolchain) should be packages.

We use the additiv approach at work.  That which you do not include is
omitted.  Doable, but keeping the dependency lists accurate since we
originally did this work for 3.2 has been the biggest issue...

Warner
Received on Thu May 25 2006 - 18:07:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC