Scott, It seems that you aren't aware that Intel/NetBSD implementation is completely userland one and it uses any block device/file as backing store (no interaction with CAM). Therefore, it won't interfere with whatever work you and others do in the CAM area. -Maxim Scott Long wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody has any objections to importing iSCSI target >> daemon from NetBSD (Intel) into the base. >> >> -Maxim > > Yes. I'm nearing completion of locking CAM, and adding new subsystems > is not going > to help that effort at the moment. I'd also like you to talk with Matt > Jacob and Nate Lawson > about it since they have quite a bit of current experience with the SCSI > target side of things. > So in other words, a drive-by commit is not welcome and will be drive-by > uncommitted unless > you work with the people who can provide help and guidance. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >Received on Mon May 29 2006 - 19:39:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC