Re: Importing iSCSI target from NetBSD

From: Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:19:06 -0600
AH, I did not know that.  But that raises another question.  FreeBSD
already has a SCSI target framework, so how does this NetBSD code fit 
into that?  Or are you suggesting that consistency isn't important?

Scott


Maxim Sobolev wrote:

> Scott,
> 
> It seems that you aren't aware that Intel/NetBSD implementation is 
> completely userland one and it uses any block device/file as backing 
> store (no interaction with CAM). Therefore, it won't interfere with 
> whatever work you and others do in the CAM area.
> 
> -Maxim
> 
> Scott Long wrote:
> 
>> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if anybody has any objections to importing iSCSI target 
>>> daemon from NetBSD (Intel) into the base.
>>>
>>> -Maxim
>>
>>
>> Yes.  I'm nearing completion of locking CAM, and adding new subsystems 
>> is not going
>> to help that effort at the moment.  I'd also like you to talk with 
>> Matt Jacob and Nate Lawson
>> about it since they have quite a bit of current experience with the 
>> SCSI target side of things.
>> So in other words, a drive-by commit is not welcome and will be 
>> drive-by uncommitted unless
>> you work with the people who can provide help and guidance.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>>
>>
> 
Received on Mon May 29 2006 - 20:19:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC