On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 09:24:07AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > ports/lang/gfortran > > >From the Makefile > > MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../gcc41/ > PKGNAMESUFFIX= -withfortran > WITH_FORTRAN= yes > > Thus, this gfortran will be the one that is bundled with GCC 4.1.1 > by the FSF foundation. I know this version works (for some definition > of work) on i386 and amd64 FreeBSD. I don't have access to other > archs for testing. I'm saddened to see FORTRAN ripped out of the base system - and I'd personally do the import work if it weren't for the the extra dependencies GNU FORTRAN 9x requires. But 'ports/lang/gfortran' is an abomination. If we are to remove FORTRAN from the base system - we need to start building it again with the GCC port. 'ports/lang/gfortran' not only installs a FORTRAN compiler (which is only about %5 of the GCC build time and size), but a C/C++/Java compiler also. The current split is quite annoying. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?Received on Tue May 30 2006 - 00:06:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC