In message: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok_at_webmail.leidinger.net> Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net> writes: : Quoting John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400): : : > We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. Only : > cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and ufs : > alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs : > directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. : : I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are : cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed. Actually, I expect there to NOT be a lot of moves if/when we change VCS. Just because a tool makes it easy, doesn't mean that it also solves the problem of reaching consensus on how to make the moves. WarnerReceived on Sun Oct 01 2006 - 18:03:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:01 UTC