Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

In message: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok_at_webmail.leidinger.net>
            Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net> writes:
: Quoting John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):
: 
: > We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
: > cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
: > alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
: > directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.
: 
: I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
: cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.

Actually, I expect there to NOT be a lot of moves if/when we change
VCS.  Just because a tool makes it easy, doesn't mean that it also
solves the problem of reaching consensus on how to make the moves.

Warner