Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:51 +0200
Quoting John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):

> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.

I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Vegeterians beware!  You are what you eat.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 04:27:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC