Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 
> -0400):
> 
>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  
>> Only
>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs 
>> and ufs
>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the 
>> extra isofs
>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.
> 
> 
> I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
> cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 

Moves in CVS are relatively easy too, it's just that they can only
be performed by a special group of people, and that special group
rarely responds to requests.  So, it's a policy problem, not a
technology problem.  I would imagine than any new VCS that the project
adopts would have similar policies in place, and moves will still be
impossible.

Scott