Jeremie Le Hen wrote: to workdir. Suggestions? > > Well, this is a neat idea. However I think this is not homogeneous in > regard to the current behaviour of TinyBSD: while the base system would > still be included on a per-file basis, library dependencies being > brought in automatically, using pkg_add(1) for third-party apps would > lead to include the whole package, including manpages, documentation, > configuration files along with the binaries. Moreover, this may not be > a desirable behaviour for an embedded system. > Yes, but my idea was install it on temporary directory and remove all unnecessary files. > My feeling is that TinyBSD has used the KISS principle so far. The code > as well as the configuration is somewhat raw (no offence here), but it is > thereby easy to use, debug and modify at needs. I am going to code this > in my source tree this afternoon and I will be glad to provide you the > patch. > That's right, make tinybsd simpler is really our idea :) Send to me your patch and i'll take a look. Thanks JeanReceived on Wed Oct 25 2006 - 11:03:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:01 UTC