On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Scott Long wrote.. > John Baldwin wrote: > >On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:43, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>Eric Anderson wrote: > >> > >>>I noticed that cd9660 file system is in sys/isofs/cd9660 instead of what > >>>seems more logical: sys/fs/cd9660. Is there any reason not to move it? > >>> Curious mostly.. > >>> > >>>Eric > >>> > >>> > >> > >>Inertia, mostly. And if you move cd9660, do you also move ufs? Let the > >>bi-yearly debate begin..... > >> > >>Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up > >>fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, > >>so thanks for giving it a kickstart. > > > > > >We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > >Only cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs > >and ufs alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the > >extra isofs directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. > > > > What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And > don't forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the > smell of fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. Now where is that Wagner MP3 again.. ?? -- Wilko Bulte wilko_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Sep 29 2006 - 17:10:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC