Chuck Swiger wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> On 4/3/07, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Patch ld(1) to detect the condition and don't unlink the device node? >> >> Yes, but there has to be a generic solution, so that >> we don't reinvent the wheel for every one of the >> thousands apps that may do this. >> >> Isn't there some safety-net wrapper function that >> refuses to remove device nodes and maybe some other >> types of files? > > Why not set a filesystem flag like schg on device nodes under a devfs > tree...? Well, I suspect that it may cause ld(1) fail instead. What we want it to do is to not perform unlink(2) before open(2) when -o argument is device node. -MaximReceived on Wed Apr 04 2007 - 21:29:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC