Hi, Maxim, Andrew, Chuck, On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:28:38PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>Isn't there some safety-net wrapper function that > >>refuses to remove device nodes and maybe some other > >>types of files? > > > >Why not set a filesystem flag like schg on device nodes under a devfs > >tree...? > > Well, I suspect that it may cause ld(1) fail instead. What we want it to > do is to not perform unlink(2) before open(2) when -o argument is device > node. Do you have any idea why ld(1) doesn't merely use open(2) with O_TRUNC, instead of unlinking the file ? Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >Received on Thu Apr 05 2007 - 19:05:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC