Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Friday 06 April 2007 01:43 pm, Roman Divacky wrote: > > I dont like this, I would prefer some dynamic determining > > whether sysv symbols are present and if not just fill > > in "safe" values. > You know I have used sysctlbyname before but it was shot down by > des. :-( I didn't shoot anything down. If you read my email again, you'll see that I pointed out that it was slow, but that we didn't really have a choice precisely because sysv{msg,sem} were not guaranteed to be present. Dropping sysctlbyname() was *your* choice. I agreed with the revised patch because you pointed out that linprocfs depends on linux, which depends on sysv{msg,sem}, so we *could* rely on their presence. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Fri Apr 06 2007 - 19:20:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC