On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:22:26AM +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > Hello Kris, > > You wrote on Friday, April 20, 2007, 2:39:03 AM: > > KK> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 02:33:53AM +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > >> Hello Jason, > >> > >> You wrote on Friday, April 20, 2007, 1:20:27 AM: > >> > >> JE> Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > >> >> I try to test clamav 0.90.2 on current and got strange errors: > >> >> > >> >> LibClamAV Warning: Multipart/alternative MIME message contains no boundary header > >> >> LibClamAV Warning: Multipart/ZZZZZZZZZZZZ?????? MIME message contains no boundary header > >> >> LibClamAV Warning: Multipart/related MIME message contains no boundary header > >> >> > >> >> And sometimes clamd segfaults. > >> >> > >> >> This Warnings issued randomly and it looks like race condition. > >> >> > >> >> This problem occurred only when running two or more clamdscan > >> >> processes in parallel. With one process no warnings on same test > >> JE> ^^^^^^^^^ > >> >> messages. > >> > >> JE> Processes, not threads? If so, there's really no way malloc can be to > >> JE> blame for a race condition. > >> > >> problem in clamd - it is multithread application. > >> > >> clamdscan used only for load one or more thread in clamd. > > KK> Note that jemalloc malloc debugging exposes different application bugs > KK> than phkmalloc did (due to technical differences). There were a > KK> number of such application bugs found during the initial testing, and > KK> (absent any direct evidence to the contrary) it is likely that this is > KK> another one. > > Clamav code quality is low, and probably it has bugs :( > But not obvious how to find this bugs. Turn off AJ then ;-) KrisReceived on Thu Apr 19 2007 - 21:27:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:09 UTC