Doug Barton wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > However, I noticed that the "refresh" interval of the root zone is > > 1800, i.e. it would be fetched every 30 minutes, > > No, refresh is how often the master servers are checked for serial > number changes. True, I forgot about that. Thanks for reminding me. > This is why what's suggested below is not a good idea either. Of course, you're right. By the way, I have changed from hints to slaves on the DNS servers for a large server farm (just testing right now; I might go back to hints if I don't feel it's worth it). It _seems_ a few applications run with lower latency, but I'll need to run some benchmarks in order to get some hard numbers. I will keep the hints zone on my office workstation and on my home machine. There seems to be consensus that slaving the root is not desirable in these cases. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert SewellReceived on Fri Aug 03 2007 - 07:12:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC