Re: nfe(4) issues

From: Chris <chrcoluk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:52:29 +0100
On 09/08/07, Oliver Fromme <olli_at_lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
>
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>  > Tony Holmes wrote:
>  > > Let me add a "I concur" to this. I upgaded to 7-current 4 weeks ago
>  > > for this very reason and I have been pleased with the stability and
>  > > performance. I have enough confidence to deploy into production in
>  > > the next couple of weeks.
>  >
>  > gcc 4.2.0 in -current has known defects.
>
> Yes, I know, that's why the default optimization setting
> in 7-current has been changed from -O2 to -O1 recently,
> until gcc 4.2.1 is in the tree.  With -O1 I haven't
> encountered any problems so far ...  Of course that
> doesn't mean there aren't any problems.  But I'm
> actually very confident right now.  :-)
>
> Best regards
>   Oliver
>
> --
> Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
> Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
> secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
> chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
>
> FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
>
> "And believe me, as a C++ programmer, I don't hesitate to question
> the decisions of language designers.  After a decent amount of C++
> exposure, Python's flaws seem ridiculously small." -- Ville Vainio
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>

Is there a good reason why 7.0 is going to be released using a bad
version of gcc? or is 4.2.1 going in before release?

Chris
Received on Thu Aug 23 2007 - 15:19:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC