On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:52:29PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 09/08/07, Oliver Fromme <olli_at_lurza.secnetix.de> wrote: > > > > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Tony Holmes wrote: > > > > Let me add a "I concur" to this. I upgaded to 7-current 4 weeks ago > > > > for this very reason and I have been pleased with the stability and > > > > performance. I have enough confidence to deploy into production in > > > > the next couple of weeks. > > > > > > gcc 4.2.0 in -current has known defects. > > > > Yes, I know, that's why the default optimization setting > > in 7-current has been changed from -O2 to -O1 recently, > > until gcc 4.2.1 is in the tree. With -O1 I haven't > > encountered any problems so far ... Of course that > > doesn't mean there aren't any problems. But I'm > > actually very confident right now. :-) > > > > Best regards > > Oliver > > > > -- > > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. > > Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Gesch?ftsfuehrung: > > secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M?n- > > chen, HRB 125758, Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart > > > > FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd > > > > "And believe me, as a C++ programmer, I don't hesitate to question > > the decisions of language designers. After a decent amount of C++ > > exposure, Python's flaws seem ridiculously small." -- Ville Vainio > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > > > Is there a good reason why 7.0 is going to be released using a bad > version of gcc? or is 4.2.1 going in before release? 4.2.1 has been in for a week or two... -- Brooks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC