On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: PJD> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:34:11PM +0100, Hugo Silva wrote: PJD> > How's the performance on the geli-backed pool ? PJD> PJD> It depends a lot on CPU speed, but you should be ready for visible PJD> performance drop. I'll give you two examples: [examples snipped] PJD> But don't you worry, when you must have encryption, you don't really PJD> care about performance. And when you decided not to use encryption, PJD> because it introduces too big overhead, it only means that you didn't PJD> need encryption in the first place:) Well, I suppose most usage patterns imply that only part of data really needs encryption (as only part really needs copies>1 or compression), hence it would be *extremely* useful if one can ``zfs set encryption=on tank/home/joe'' (could it be done via pluggable geom modules or something?) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck_at_FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck_at_rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:35:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC