Re: [PATCH] gprof's broken in 7-CURRENT

Given the recent feedback in the lists, yes, that's a better way of
handling it.  Thanks :)

On 2007-12-04 09:55, David O'Brien <obrien_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure what the action item is.
> This looks OK to me - do you want me to commit it to HEAD right now so we
> can let it soak a little before discussing it with RE?
>
> -- David
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:38:27AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > Please pass this through the release engineering team, Bruce Evans
> > (who has the largest number of commits to the file), and our gcc
> > folks (David O'Brien, and Alexander Kabaev).
> >
> > If it is considered safe for RELENG_7 (what will become 7.0-RELEASE),
> > then it's probably a good idea to commit it.  It looks `harmless' to me,
> > but it certainly won't harm to get a proper review from much more
> > experienced people (added to the Cc: list).
> >
> > It would be marvellous to have non-broken profiling in 7.0.
> >
> > - Giorgos
> >
> > On 2007-11-30 01:38, Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos_at_ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
> > > I couldn't wait for Garrett :) so I went on and tested your patch and
> > > gprof seems to work fine for me (at least for the executables I was
> > > interested in profiling anyway). This is i386 on a 7.0-BETA3 kernel and
> > > 7.0-BETA1 world. What are the chances for this to be committed in time
> > > for 7.0R?
> >
> > On 2007-11-29 20:24, Luoqi Chen <luoqi_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > Garrett, would you like to try out my fix? It's actually quite simple,