Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Robert Watson <rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> I'd certainly be fine with it being added to GENERIC on our various 
>> architectures.
>
> s/GENERIC/DEFAULTS/

At the risk of creating a bikeshed, I thought we had a consensus that DEFAULTS 
should never be used :-).

What I'd love to get, as a bikeshed alternative, would be feedback on the 
usability of DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps...  I know there are 
a few nits, such as the fact that "continue" at the end of an 
automatically-run script for a KDB entry event still results in sitting at a 
DDB prompt, for example.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge