Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:43PM -0800, Paul Allen wrote: orant of I/O that > > this was also on 4.11 which probably does not use softupdates. yes it does.. Doesn't have UFS2 and snapshots however. > > that does not mean that a scheduler is useless in general. > in fact, what i find questionable is hardwiring unnecessary > (in the sense that they are done only for performance reasons) > ordering constraints in the layers above. I cannot comment for > the disk, but e.g. for the process scheduler there are priority > updates in many places depending on what the process is doing. > > cheers > luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Fri Jan 05 2007 - 22:11:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC