Attilio Rao wrote: > 2006/7/28, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>: >> >> After some thinking, I think it's better using init/fini methods >> (since they hide the sizeof(struct turnstile) with size parameter). >> >> Feedbacks and comments are welcome: >> http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/uma_sync_init.diff > > [CC'ed all the interested people] > > Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. > This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is > used into the Linux world for benchmarks, AFAIK. > I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very > interesting, and I think it worths a commit :) > I think that results can be even better on a Xeon machine (I had no > chance to reproduce this on some of these). > (Results taken in consideration have been measured after some starts, > in order to minimize caching differences). > > The patch: > http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.diff > > The benchmark results: > http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.benchmark those are very big differences! what does the benchmark actually measure? > > The kernel options file: > http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/CURRENT > > For any information, comment, etc. please feel free to contact me. > > Attilio > >Received on Tue Jan 16 2007 - 17:30:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC