2007/1/16, Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>: > Attilio Rao wrote: > > 2006/7/28, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>: > >> > >> After some thinking, I think it's better using init/fini methods > >> (since they hide the sizeof(struct turnstile) with size parameter). > >> > >> Feedbacks and comments are welcome: > >> http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/uma_sync_init.diff > > > > [CC'ed all the interested people] > > > > Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. > > This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is > > used into the Linux world for benchmarks, AFAIK. > > I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very > > interesting, and I think it worths a commit :) > > I think that results can be even better on a Xeon machine (I had no > > chance to reproduce this on some of these). > > (Results taken in consideration have been measured after some starts, > > in order to minimize caching differences). > > > > The patch: > > http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.diff > > > > The benchmark results: > > http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.benchmark > > those are very big differences! > what does the benchmark actually measure? just time ./ebizzy (which create a lot of contention inside the kernel). Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Tue Jan 16 2007 - 17:39:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC