"Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > Hi, Ian. > > > I got this panic yesterday on a fairly busy firewall. I have some > > private patches to ip_fw2.c and to the em driver (see the earlier > > "em0 hijacking traffic to port 623" thread). I don't think this > > panic is a result of those changes. > > > It occurred round about the time an address was added to an interface. > > I have a patch that can help you (i guess..). > Can you test this patch? > > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/inaddr_locking/ Thanks. Wow, that looks like it touches a lot more than just ipfw. It took about 1.5 years of production at 2.3 billion backets a day to trigger this condition twice. It's going to be difficult to tell if this patch fixes the problem. Ian -- Ian FreislichReceived on Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:07:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC