On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:01:48PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:12:08PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > > Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (revision 126260) > > > +++ tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (working copy) > > > _at__at_ -1747,6 +1747,12 _at__at_ infer_loop_bounds_from_undefined (struct > > > { > > > bb = bbs[i]; > > > > > > + /* If BB is not executed in each iteration of the loop, we cannot > > > + use the operations in it to infer reliable upper bound on the > > > + # of iterations of the loop. */ > > > + if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, bb)) > > > + continue; > > > + > > > for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi)) > > > { > > > tree stmt = bsi_stmt (bsi); > > > > > > I'm going to test this. > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > I just tested the patch on my desktop and it seems to work. The test > > code now compiles like it should. Hopefully it will be part of 4.2.1. > > Will be nice if this patch will be commited in instead of my > sys.mk workaround. Alexander? afaik they plan to release gcc 4.2.1 on July 13th, thats a week, possibly two ahead. maybe we can wait and import the 4.2.1 directly. 4.2.1 contains some more bug fixes so it would be worth it. romanReceived on Wed Jul 04 2007 - 18:56:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC