Quoting Michael Bushkov <bushman_at_freebsd.org> (from Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:46:49 +0400): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Are my expectations about cached wrong, or is it misbehaving? > > Your expectations are not wrong. There is a cached version in my > perforce branch that has all the necessary functionality (it watches > local files and flushes the cache when needed). It's in the process of > commitment. I'm sorry that it takes so much time to get it committed. Thanks for the status update. >> And while we are at it, is there really a need to print the cached >> version number and the fact that it was developed during GSoC 2005 >> at each start? It clutters the visual appearance at boot time. > > While I was developing cached (during GSoC 2005, as you can guess) I > was extremely inspired by the GSoC program and about the people that I > had a chance to meet because of this program. That's why I put that > message. Actually, I'm still as inspired :) . I can delete the message, > however. No program/daemon in the base system which is started at boot time prints such a message (at least I don't remember one in my typical configurations), so I would say we have a lot of precedence which suggests at least to suppress this message at boot time... Bye, Alexander. -- There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics. -- Benjamin Disraeli http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137Received on Tue Jul 10 2007 - 06:19:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC