Ed Schouten wrote: > * Michiel Boland <michiel_at_boland.org> wrote: >> --- __getosreldate.c.orig 2007-07-10 22:29:02.000000000 +0200 >> +++ __getosreldate.c 2007-07-10 22:28:20.000000000 +0200 >> _at__at_ -42,13 +42,10 _at__at_ >> int >> __getosreldate(void) >> { >> - static int osreldate; >> + int osreldate; >> size_t len; >> int oid[2]; >> int error, osrel; >> - >> - if (osreldate != 0) >> - return (osreldate); >> >> oid[0] = CTL_KERN; >> oid[1] = KERN_OSRELDATE; > > Isn't the problem solved by just initializing osreldate with zero? > I'm pretty sure that the osreldate should be automatically initialized to zero since it's static. I wonder if this has been broken on sparc64 somehow. ScottReceived on Tue Jul 10 2007 - 19:27:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC