On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:41:04AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, gnn_at_freebsd.org wrote: > >At Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:49:37 +0200, > >Peter Blok wrote: Hi all. [KAME's IPSec removal and ipsec-tools] > I have a preliminary hackish patch. The problem is that I have other > patches in there as well. I'll have to disunite them. > > I was hoping that ipsec-tools would release earlier so that the gcc4 > compile issues would have been solved already only leaving us with the > directory changes for the #inlcude files... Ipsec-tools 0.7.0 Release (which includes gcc4 fixes) should have been released this week. We did NOT release it until now for various reasons, including the fact that I hoped we could fix this include problem for 0.7.0 release. But if it is quite simple to fix for -HEAD, which now only have netipsec/ipsec.h, it is harder to solve cleanly for older versions, which have both netinet6/ipsec.h and netipsec/ipsec.h, and on which I just don't know how to guess which one we should use. I think I'll commit today a patch to detect the case where we only have netipsec/ipsec.h (so it will compile again on -HEAD), and we'll keep the netinet6/ipsec.h Vs netipsec/ipsec.h problem as an open issue until someone gives me a clean way to decide which one we should use when we found both. Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.comReceived on Fri Jul 13 2007 - 05:49:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC