On Friday 13 July 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 7/13/07, Hugo Silva <hugo_at_barafranca.com> wrote: > > But these have been talked about on the lists before. > > > > What's new for me is the following bits of the firewall (pf) logs: > > > > tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned > > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol > > decode listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), > > capture size 96 bytes > > 000000 rule 0/0(match): block unkn(99) on em0: SERVER_IP.52582 > > > 70.87.97.148.80: [|tcp] > > 29. 232416 rule 0/0(match): block unkn(99) on em0: SERVER_IP.53798 > > > 70.87.97.148.80: [|tcp] > > <snip> > > > Notice the unkn(99) and the bad hdr length errors. on 6.2, this > > problem doesn't exist. Is this something new or is it related to the > > spurious rsts & syncache errors ? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Hugo > > It's known bug, they are trying to fix it before FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. No it's not. It's a known feature. The attached patch fixes it. This needs to go through tcpdump.org, but I haven't had time to take care of it, yet. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC