Re: nfe(4) vs. nve(4)

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_fer.hr>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:41:43 +0200
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:

 > Shigeaki Tagashira and I had been working on enhancing nfe(4) for
 > several months. Now I think we'got stable working nfe(4) and it's time
 > to supesede nve(4) with the overhauled nfe(4) before branching to 7.

Please do, my on-board NIC is finally working with your new source!

nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce MCP55 Networking Adapter> port 0xc400-0xc407 mem 
0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff,0xfe02a000-0xfe02a0ff,0xfe029000-0xfe02900f irq 22 
at device 8.0 on pci0
miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0
e1000phy0: <Marvell 88E1116 Gigabit PHY> PHY 0 on miibus1
e1000phy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 
1000baseTX-FDX, auto
nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:50:8d:95:b3:5d
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]

nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 
1500 options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
         ether 00:50:8d:95:b3:5d
         inet 10.0.0.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex,flag0,flag1>)
         status: active
Received on Sun Jun 03 2007 - 19:37:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC