Re: nfe(4) vs. nve(4)

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_fer.hr>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:41:05 +0200

Ivan Voras wrote:

> Please do, my on-board NIC is finally working with your new source!

Hmmm, I've just got a random reboot. Don't know for sure if it's related
to nfe.

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on Sun Jun 03 2007 - 22:41:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: youshi10_at_u.washington.edu: "Re: Call for testers, significant sched_lock patch."
Previous message: youshi10_at_u.washington.edu: "Kudos to everyone who worked on the gcc-4.2 merge"
In reply to: Ivan Voras: "Re: nfe(4) vs. nve(4)"
Next in thread: Pyun YongHyeon: "Re: nfe(4) vs. nve(4)"
Reply: Pyun YongHyeon: "Re: nfe(4) vs. nve(4)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC