On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Max Laier <max_at_love2party.net> writes: >>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes: >>>> Max Laier <max_at_love2party.net> writes: >>>>> Anything else? >>>> >>>> ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice... >>> >>> ... I'm at it. Could you maybe lend a hand with importing >>> libevent[1] which is a requirement for ftp-proxy now? It should make >>> a good addition to base anyhow - as a convenient (and portable) >>> interface to kqueue. >> >> Convenient and portable, but buggy as hell - we used it in Varnish to >> begin with but had to ditch it due to a combination of design flaws and >> bugs. It also suffers from creeping featuritis - the latest version >> includes a DNS resolver and a full HTTP implementation... it's only a >> matter of time before it grows a lisp interpreter and a mail reader. > > hmmm ... okay, didn't know that. But what do you suggest as an > alternative? I certainly won't reinvent the wheel for the libevent calls > in ftp-proxy. Importing libevent code private to ftp-proxy seems equally > wrong. So the alternatives - to me at least - are either importing > libevent or leaveing ftp-proxy in ports. Pick your poison. ports. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeTReceived on Wed Jun 06 2007 - 09:50:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC